Wall Street Journal Chinese denies self-censorship

Earlier today, we broke the news that Reuters Chinese and WSJ Chinese were practicing self-censorship concerning the Hong Kong democracy protests. While we have not yet heard back from Reuters, we have received vehement denial from WSJ Chinese editor Li Yuan and WSJ editor-in-chief Gerard Baker via Twitter.

Li Yuan asked via Twitter whether we at GreatFire.org were aware that WSJ had been blocked in China for four months (the implication being that because the website is already blocked, they have no reason to self-censor). It appears that she did not take the time to read our report at all before commenting.

@niubi If you don't read Chinese, call me to check your facts. ChineseWSJ has been blocked in China for 4 months; @GreatFireChina Do U know?

— Li Yuan (@LiYuan6) September 29, 2014

Here’s the quote from our report which is the second paragraph of the article:

In November 2013, China blocked WSJ Chinese and Reuters Chinese for a few days. The act was meant to intimidate both companies and to warn them that they have to keep their content in line with Beijing. WSJ Chinese was subsequently blocked for good in June 2014 after the site posted multiple news items related to the 25th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square protests on the website’s front page. Reuters Chinese did not post anything related to the June anniversary and remained unblocked.

You may recall that Bloomberg has been accused of curbing articles that might anger China after their site was blocked in China and the company received pressure from the Chinese government over their business operations in the country.

The main purpose of our website GreatFire.org is to test what internet websites are being blocked in China. We automatically test the Great Firewall of China and update a list of blocked websites in real time. We also keep an eye on developments related to censorship in China.

Li Yuan also provided a list of articles about Hong Kong and featured one article covering the protest. That one article was published after our original report. 

@GreatFireChina Please run a correction/clarification or you can retweet my previous tweet with photo. pic.twitter.com/ZzLKKKhZdK

— Li Yuan (@LiYuan6) September 29, 2014

We have updated our original report to reflect this:

Update on Sept 29, 8:30 AM Hong Kong time:

After we published our article which was widely reposted, Wall Street Jounal Chinese posted itsfirst news covering the actual protest, dated September 29 at 7:54AM Hong Kong time. Because WSJ Chinese published the "news" about 24 hours* after the start of the protest and its first English language report, we believe that WSJ Chinese is trying to save its image after being publicly called out for self-censorship. Still, we welcome the change. At least WSJ Chinese readers now know about the protest in Hong Kong - better late than never.  In comparison, Reuters Chinese has not posted any news covering the protest even now.

*SCMP started to live report the protest on September 28 at 8AM. WSJ's report in English was dated September 28 at 6:08AM. (Hong Kong time).

The remaining stories that Li referenced do not actually cover the protest itself. For example, the first article on the list is dated September 9th and is titled “Occupy Central planned for October”.

Gerard Baker, editor-in-chief of WSJ (Not WSJ Chinese) also tweeted about our accusations.

@JamesFallows @iandenisjohnson Oh I see! That justifies the two of you taking to Twitter to so casually impugn our integrity, doesn't it?

— Gerard Baker (@gerardtbaker) September 29, 2014

@JamesFallows @iandenisjohnson Rather than, say, checking to see whether, just for example, our website has actually been blocked in China?

— Gerard Baker (@gerardtbaker) September 29, 2014

Again, we believe that we are experts when it comes to the Great Firewall of China. In fact, WSJ itself has regularly quoted us as an anti-censorship activist group in China. Baker should also at least read our original report before denying it.

Some users and internal WSJ staff have suspected that a shortage of staff on a Sunday before a holiday might be the cause of delaying translation. The time gap between the English article, attributed to ISABELLA STEGER, PRUDENCE HO and CHESTER YUNG, and the Chinese article, attributed to the same reporters, is 25 hours and 46 minutes. This time delay might be reasonable for average stories but for news that grabbed headlines around the world, on virtually every media outlet, this delay is simply unbelievable.

In addition, in the past, when WSJ Chinese has been translating important news, they usually post a short blurb together with the comment “detailed report will follow”. We have provided an example below. According to Google, there are 83,500 incidences where WSJ Chinese has posted the translation of the title of the story and posted content in a separate article when the translation is complete. Is this story really not more important that 83,500 others?

trans.png

We want WSJ Chinese to explain why it takes more than 25 hours to translate a sentence into Chinese or give any other reason why a report is being delayed despite the fact that it is the most important news item of the day.

WSJ Chinese has publicly denounced self-censorship and we applaud their stance on the matter. But we also hope that their actions echo their sentiment - in this case, they do not. Reuters China has remained silent on the self-censorship issue, which is self-censorship in itself.

Reuters China posted its first report about the Hong Kong protest on Monday, September 29 at 11:30am, 30 hours later than WSJ English’s first report.

Even so, we welcome the addition of this Chinese language content. We’ve again reached out to both media publications to hear their side of the story. If this is truly an issue about being understaffed, then this raises serious questions about the management of these two news organizations. Your peers all published timely stories about the Hong Kong protests in Chinese. Advertisers will likely notice - they know that breaking news drives eyeballs.

We also know that journalists are under enormous amounts of stress and we respect the fact that both WSJ and Reuters have reporters on the ground, putting themselves in danger to report this story. But why make such an effort if the fruits of that labor become evident more than 24 hours after the event for the audience that deserves to hear this story the most? Here's hoping that your best Chinese language coverage of the Hong Kong protests is yet to come.

Very proud of my colleague Tyrone Siu who took this amazing photo of HK protesters being tear gassed on Sunday. pic.twitter.com/jUGkGfAeww

— Venus Wu (@wu_venus) September 29, 2014

Comments

More Blog Posts

Subscribe to our mailing list
Show content from Blog | Google+ | Twitter | All. Subscribe to our blog using RSS.

Mon, Aug 03, 2020

Announcing the Release of GreatFire Appmaker

GreatFire (https://en.greatfire.org/), a China-focused censorship monitoring organization, is proud to announce that we have developed and released a new anti-censorship tool that will enable any blocked media outlet, blogger, human rights group, or civil society organization to evade censors and get their content onto the phones of millions of readers and supporters in China and other countries that censor the Internet.

GreatFire has built an Android mobile app creator, called “GreatFire AppMaker”, that can be used by organizations to unblock their content for users in China and other countries. Organizations can visit a website (https://appmaker.greatfire.org/) which will compile an app that is branded with the organization’s own logo and will feature their own, formerly blocked content. The app will also contain a special, censorship-circumventing web browser so that users can access the uncensored World Wide Web. The apps will use multiple strategies, including machine learning, to evade advanced censorship tactics employed by the Chinese authorities.  This project will work equally well in other countries that have China-like censorship restrictions. For both organizations and end users, the apps will be free, fast, and extremely easy to use.

This project was inspired by China-based GreatFire’s first-hand experience with our own FreeBrowser app (https://freebrowser.org/en) and desire to help small NGOs who may not have the in-house expertise to circumvent Chinese censorship. GreatFire’s anti-censorship tools have worked in China when others do not. FreeBrowser directs Chinese internet users to normally censored stories from the app’s start page (http://manyvoices.news/).

Fri, Jul 24, 2020

Apple, anticompetition, and censorship

On July 20, 2020, GreatFire wrote to all 13 members of the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law of the U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary, requesting a thorough examination into Apple’s practice of censorship of its App Store, and an investigation into how the company collaborates with the Chinese authorities to maintain its unique position as one of the few foreign tech companies operating profitably in the Chinese digital market.  

This letter was sent a week before Apple CEO TIm Cook will be called for questioning in front of the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law. The CEOs of Amazon, Google and Facebook will also be questioned on July 27, as part of the Committee’s ongoing investigation into competition in the digital marketplace.

This hearing offers an opportunity to detail to the Subcommittee how Apple uses its closed operating ecosystem to not only abuse its market position but also to deprive certain users, most notably those in China, of their right to download and use apps related to privacy, secure communication, and censorship circumvention.

We hope that U.S. House representatives agree with our view that Apple should not be allowed to do elsewhere what would be considered as unacceptable in the U.S. Chinese citizens are not second class citizens. Private companies such as Apple compromise themselves and their self-proclaimed values of freedom and privacy when they collaborate with the Chinese government and its censors.

Mon, Jun 10, 2019

Apple Censoring Tibetan Information in China

Apple has a long history of censorship when it comes to information about Tibet. In 2009, it was revealed that several apps related to the Dalai Lama were not available in the China App Store. The developers of these apps were not notified that their apps were removed. When confronted with these instances of censorship, an Apple spokesperson simply said that the company “continues to comply with local laws”.

In December, 2017, at a conference in China, when asked about working with the Chinese authorities to censor the Apple App Store, Tim Cook proclaimed:

"Your choice is: do you participate, or do you stand on the sideline and yell at how things should be. And my own view very strongly is you show up and you participate, you get in the arena because nothing ever changes from the sideline."

In the ten years since Apple was first criticized for working with the Chinese authorities to silence already marginalized voices, what has changed? Apple continues to strictly follow the censorship orders of the Chinese authorities. When does Tim Cook expect that his company will help to bring about positive change in China?

Based on data generated from https://applecensorship.com, Apple has now censored 29 popular Tibetan mobile applications in the China App Store. Tibetan-themed apps dealing with news, religious study, tourism, and even games are being censored by Apple. A full list of the censored apps appear below.

Thu, Jun 06, 2019

Report Shines Spotlight on Apple’s Censorship Practices in China

The newest Ranking Digital Rights Corporate Accountability Index makes recommendations on what companies and governments need to do in order to improve the protection of internet users’ human rights around the world. Ranking Digital Rights (RDR) works to promote freedom of expression and privacy on the internet by creating global standards and incentives for companies to respect and protect users’ rights.

In their 2019 Accountability Index, RDR looks at the policies of 24 of the world’s most important internet companies in respect to freedom of expression and privacy and highlights the companies that have made improvements and those companies that need to do more. RDR notes that:

Insufficient transparency makes it easier for private parties, governments, and companies themselves to abuse their power over online speech and avoid accountability.

In particular, the report highlights how Apple has abused their power over online speech, and notes instances of this in China. According to the report, Apple has not disclosed data around the content that it removes from its App Store when faced with requests from the government authorities.

While [Apple] disclosed data about government requests to restrict accounts, it disclosed no data about content removal requests, such as requests to remove apps from its App Store. Apple revealed little about policies and practices affecting freedom of expression, scoring below all other U.S. companies in this category.

The report makes intelligent and sensible recommendations for governments. However, the recommendations also highlight how difficult it is to have these discussions with governments like China’s.

Thu, Nov 30, 2017

About those 674 apps that Apple censored in China

Apple opened the door on its censorship practices in China - but just a crack.
Subscribe to our blog using RSS.

Comments

you guys really write well
Wall Street Journal

inspired a lot from this post am following this blog regularly and found very good for bookmarking thanks admin
new year sms in hindi 2015
happy new year sms 2015
happy new year 2015 wallpapers
happy new year 2015 quotes
happy new year 2015
happy new year wishes 2015

I enjoys a lot while reading your posts because you explained your post very deeply in a very easy and clear language. Thanks for your support and Happy Blogging :D
New Year 2015
Happy New Year 2015
Happy New Year 2015 Quotes
Thanks you for sharing this informative post over here...

this post is awesome, great msg for us, plz update ur blog for daily basis, i am regular visitor of this site, so keep posting for us,

click the below links to create backlink
best free backlink website
click here for msg movie

thanks for this post, keep it up for updating us, i am waiting for ur new article.
IPL8 live stream 2015
thanks again

inspired a lot from this post am following this blog regularly and found very good for bookmarking thanks admin

happy mothers day sms in hindi
happy mothers day in hindi

Oh! It seems someone is triggered. There is no freedom of speech in this country. instagram viewer A lighter version of NK?

Add new comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.